<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dean terry &#187; Consumerism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deanterry.com/blog/index.php/what/consumerism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deanterry.com/blog</link>
	<description>news . images . sounds . ideas . notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Consumerism: A Common Battleground?</title>
		<link>http://www.deanterry.com/blog/index.php/consumerism-a-common-battleground/</link>
		<comments>http://www.deanterry.com/blog/index.php/consumerism-a-common-battleground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dean terry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deanterry.com/blog/index.php/consumerism-a-common-battleground/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Sunday DMN Column &#8220;Model Citizen or Model Consumer&#8221; drew a fair number of responses. Interestingly, most of them were from conservatives &#8211; and supporting at that. Of course this is not particularly surprising. Consumerism as a would-be religion/ideology is a threat to other, more substantial value systems right and left, hence the crossover.
It seems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Sunday DMN Column &#8220;<strong><a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/city/collin/opinion/stories/081505dnedicco.22923028.html" target="_blank">Model Citizen or Model Consumer</a></strong>&#8221; drew a fair number of responses. Interestingly, most of them were from conservatives &#8211; and supporting at that. Of course this is not particularly surprising. Consumerism as a would-be religion/ideology is a threat to other, more substantial value systems right and left, hence the crossover.</p>
<p>It seems some in the religious community are up in arms about the consumerist/materialist threat. And rightly so. I had been wondering about whether local churches were dealing with this issue. Some are, as I&#8217;ve received letters from pastors and religious activists of various stripes. I still am curious how / if this issue is approached in the larger mega churches, if at all (please send me a note if you are aware of anything).</p>
<p>I also received letters from those looking for answers, solutions.</p>
<p>A reader writes &#8220;if consumerism is our new religion, how and when do you think we can find a new religion? What can make us better? (Perhaps that will be your next column?)&#8221; Next column perhaps, and the next few years obsession most likely. And I&#8217;m not sure &#8220;religion&#8221; is the right term, unless it is in the sense that theologian Paul Tillich meant: one&#8217;s &#8220;ultimate concern.&#8221; In this sense we just need to make sure consumerism is not our ultimate concern. But of course<br />
it is not so simple as that. At this level of discussion it is a philosophical/religious matter. Some think we&#8217;ve simply lost our way and need to reclaim the past. Others want contemporary, secular solutions.</p>
<p>A certain part of the cultural right is awake to these issues and they have an obvious solution on the personal side (traditional Christian values). I&#8217;m not so clear about what they would proscribe on the public side, if anything. Would they allow restrictions of marketing to youth? Fund more not-for-profit (hence no advertising) public media?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very interesting to see the common territory here. Rod Dreher, editor of DMN&#8217;s Points sent me <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/30sep02/dreher093002.asp" target="_blank">this cover article </a>he wrote a few years back for the National Review. Take a look and see what you think.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230;we are citizens before we are consumers&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;A child who grows up in a neighborhood built for human beings, not cars, may think of man&#8217;s relation to his world differently from one raised amid the throwaway utilitarianism of strip-mall architecture. One&#8217;s sensitivity to and desire for beauty, and its edifying qualities of order, harmony, &#8220;sweetness and light,&#8221; has consequences for the character of individuals and ultimately for civilization. It&#8217;s perilous to forget that.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Jacobs" target="_blank">Jane Jacobs</a>? <a href="http://www.kunstler.com/" target="_blank">Kunstler</a>? Organic veggies? Very <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1400050642/qid=1124204831/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-6792764-6455139?v=glance&amp;s=books&amp;n=507846" target="_blank">crunchy</a>. Not everyone on the right shares these opinions. Pity, because there is a great deal of shared concern.</p>
<p>&#8230; more to come on the &#8220;solutions&#8221; side over the coming months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deanterry.com/blog/index.php/consumerism-a-common-battleground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
